The Adulterous Mayor Newsome
Years ago, my father and I had a vicious argument regarding President Clinton's affair with Monica Lewinsky. He was of the mind that it did not matter. I felt quite the opposite. He made excuse after excuse for the President with ever increasing passion. Finally I realized what was going on. He wasn't forgiving the President. He was forgiving himself for having cheated on my mother countless times. If the President of the United States cheated on his wife, then he, as a regular man, could not be expected to do any different.
Now I am living in San Francisco where Mayor Gaving Newsome has just admitted to having an affair with a subordinate and nobody really seems to care. Many people are saying that what goes on in his private life is his business. That's a child's argument. A person's personal life certainly impacts how he does his job and if his job involves doling out multi-million dollar contracts, then his personal life matters even more. Poor judgment in one area will reflect in another. An old Greek saying states that he who is a righteous master of his household will be a righteous statesman. That's no different here.
Then there are others who say that it's just sex and no big deal. That would be true if he had picked up a girl at a bar and took her home. That would be true if he wasn't married at the time. Taken free from context, it was just sex. But removing it from context is simply ridiculous. First of all, he was married. And to make matters worse, his adultery partner was married too- to Newsome's good friend no less. You have to look at his transgression in context. To do otherwise is to misunderstand the event.
Fidelity matters. When you take an oath forsaking all others, it means something. There are cultures where the taking of mistresses is common but even there, it is not considered virtuous. Whether or not it is okay to cheat on your wife, it is universally agreed that it is more moral not to. For myself, I will not engage in a partnership with anyone who cheats on his wife. The way I see it, if a man can break the oath that he has taken with the one he is supposed to love above all others, what can he do to me? How can I ever trust his sincerity or lack thereof? Either every oath you take means something or they all mean nothing.
And he cheated with the wife of his good friend-- a friend that was running his campaign. What does it say about a man who cheats with a friend's wife? It says that he's a narcissist-- that he thinks he's above any rules of civility. It says that he has the weakest character imaginable. In most places in the world, this is a killing offense. It's a betrayal of the worst kind.
If Gavin Newsome was a businessman perhaps it would matter less. There, he would only be responsible to his shareholders and his Board of Directors. His power would mostly be limited to his employees. But Newsome is the Mayor of San Francisco. His decisions affect how I live my life greatly and I simply cannot trust such a man to make good decisions. He affects the lives of hundreds of thousands of people. I don't think it's unfair to expect him to conduct himself with more propriety. While I've never much agreed with most of his policy choices, I accepted him as my democratically elected mayor and gave him the respect he deserved. Unlike most people, a difference in opinion about policy doesn't make me resort to ad hominem attacks. I still don't hate him but the truth is that he has lost any moral authority he may have possessed. And if that doesn't matter to you, you should seriously ask yourself why.
4 Comments:
Agreed...you know how I feel on the topic, though San Francisco's reaction does not suprise me in the least.
3:49 PM
Kahuna, I hope you are well. I have been very busy having had to actually take a full time job and give up (for the time being anyway) the small business approach.
Just want to add that I find it ironic (hypocritical??) that in many cases it is the same people that said that Clinton's affair with Lewinski are the same people that pushed for stricter enforcement of no harassment in the workplace. I am certainly a proponent of no harassment in any form. I also accept that an occasional joke is OK but the pendulum has swung too far to one side. So if I make an off-color remark to a coworker or worse a subordinate, I lose my job and possibly go to jail but the President of the US was given a pass when there was solid evidence of physical contact with a subordinate.
I don't know if the mayor situation is also an boss-employee relationship but I think the appearance of impropriety certainly applies in that anyone who works for the city in effect reports to the mayor.
And I agree 100% that if he would cheat on his wife then he is not trustworthy in any situation.
8:52 PM
The boss-employee is a tough one. Most people meet their spouses at work but I suppose there is a difference between a boss-employee relationship and just a coworker. The point being that hard and fast rules rarely apply to personal relationships. The military has strict rules of fraternization between officers and enlisted but it still happens and with greater frequency that people would like to admit.
Newsome's affair was a boss-employee relationship. If you look at all the wrongs he committed: boss-employee, good friend's wife, he's married, she's married, he's the mayor of a major city... It's just too many instances of bad judgment rolled up into one.
It's good to hear from you my friend. I hope you are doing well at your new job!
10:09 AM
It's in fact very complex in this busy life to listen news on TV, thus I only use world wide web for that purpose, and get the hottest information.
Review my blog: dallasseocompany1.com
5:45 AM
Post a Comment
<< Home