In Defense of Teachers
As is my habit, I like to give exceptional contrary responses to anything I've written its own featured place. The following is a response to my post "Active Citizenship" written by my friend who is incidentally, the English teacher who prompted my thought excursion. A passioned, energetic and well-reasoned defense, I think it deserves a serious read. I will respond in the comments section.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Because you never discuss the various manifestations of civic duty, I stumble over your pessimistic assertion that “most educators under 50 feel they owe the Country nothing more than a check.” Similarly, because it remains unclear what qualifies for you as “a contribution to the body politic,” it is difficulty for me to understand why you believe most teachers are not qualified to teach citizenship. However, I am sure you would agree that civic duty could take on many forms beyond enlisting in your nation’s military forces. Teachers take on the responsibility of providing rising generations with the core knowledge and skills necessary to actively participate in, and perhaps even improve, their communities. For example, an English teacher’s fundamental goals are to teach a student to read critically and write for a variety of purposes and audiences. Most English teachers I know, myself included, believe there is tremendous power in the written word and that being able to identify and use rhetorical devices in a given text allows us to understand how we are persuaded to believe in another’s ideas and how we can develop convincing arguments ourselves. Such skills, which fall under the nebulous category of critical thinking skills, can prevent us from being snowed into buying material items for the wrong reasons based on slick advertisement techniques or falling victim to more dangerous propaganda. Critical thinking is the keystone of active citizenship. Your friend who decided he could not criticize the Country without contributing was demonstrating just this.
Furthermore, while I agree with you that it is important for teachers to resist the temptation to indoctrinate their students according to their personal political persuasions, teachers, whether they are conscious of it or not, are indoctrinating students in American values. After all, America’s public education roots are firmly planted in this purpose—to gather children from a variety of ethnic and cultural backgrounds and teach them a common and unifying core of knowledge, mythology and skills that serves the country’s economic and political progress. Therefore, teaching children is indeed a civic duty-- it is a contribution to the larger society. In my seven years of teaching, nearly one thousand students have passed through my classroom. Equipping a thousand people with improved literacy skills, not to mention the peripheral skills, ethics, and ideas that are taught through the literature we read and the discussions generated, is a significant contribution to the Country. Therefore, I believe I am qualified to teach citizenship.
However, above and beyond what I maintain is the civic duty intrinsic in the act of teaching our nation’s youth, most teachers I know seem to have an inherent drive to improve and protect their communities, a drive at the heart of civic duty. These teachers create curriculum that models and demonstrates this value, and perhaps even provides students with the opportunity to experience civic participation. At minimum, a Humanities teacher will expose students to a variety of American leaders who have created change in their communities models the character, values and pathways necessary to become an active citizen. But many of us go beyond this level of exposure to experiential learning as well. It is not difficult for me to incorporate civic duty into a grade-based system. For example, during the last election year, my students were required to participate in a campaign effort for a candidate of their choosing running for any level of political office. A certain number of hours, an evaluation by a supervisor, a final paper and presentation all contributed to a cumulative grade.
But even better, I watch students move towards voluntary active citizenship as a result of having this value modeling for them by teachers and their curriculum. And this leads me to respond to your statements on the role that character (or according to you, lack thereof) plays in school. I think civic duty does indeed begin with watching or reading the news, and doing so is not the same as watching or reading sports. The action of educating ourselves in the activities of our nation and other nations is the beginning of recognizing the larger communities to which we belong. Therefore, we begin to care about these larger communities; we begin to realize how we influence (both positively and negatively) them, and then often, our investment in these larger communities grows. For example, over the last two years of teaching at a private school based in a low-income, African-American neighborhood, I became increasingly uncomfortable with the lack of interaction between the school and its surrounding community. My students regarded members of the neighborhood with suspicion, fear and gross generalizations. Furthermore, the community itself is in crisis, wrestling with the usual suspects that emerge in a poor neighborhood—gangs, drugs, homicide. So I started attending meetings at city hall with our district supervisor, who wants to harness the interfaith community in this district to become a force that responds to the community’s problems. This led to the idea of an interfaith teen council. All I had to do is choose 4-5 students who I have watched become increasingly conscious and concerned for the worlds beyond the small one they move through on a daily basis (home, school), who demonstrate leadership and initiative, character traits I am convinced they learned, at least partially, in school. These students started accompanying me at the city council meetings--not because their participation was required or counted towards a grade. But simply because they care and they want to live up to the expectations of mentors they respect. I think this example illustrates that schools are quite capable of helping students build character. Earning an A on a paper after a semester’s worth of Bs and Cs, being caught cheating and suffering not only concrete consequences, but also the disapproval of a teacher you respect, overcoming the fear of public speaking, these are all character building experiences that take place in schools.
4 Comments:
Danielle-
Before anything, let me say a big "Thank you" for taking the time to write this piece. When I started my blog, this was just the type of interaction I had in mind. I sincerely appreciate your contribution. You have no idea how stoked I am you took the time to write it.
Okay, on to the meat of the issue. I would like to point out how excited teachers get when their profession in criticized in any way. I don't mean anything more than what I say here: that criticizing teachers is often placed in the same moral continuum as beating up the handicapped. And I don't mean to say that teachers are handicapped. I merely wish to point out that many believe the profession of teaching is above criticism. I don't believe that. While I detest back room sniping, I don't believe that anything is above criticism.
I would also like to make sure that you understand that in no way was my original piece meant to be a personal attack. I actually believe you, Danielle, to be one of the few teachers I've met (college included) who has a chance of imbuing her students with the traits of good citizenship. But your successes do not vindicate the pedagogy of her peers.
As always, I can't only speak for myself. Like I have already written, I speak from my experience and my experience alone. I make no definitive proclamations. I only point out what I have observed.
Now let me address the various issues point by point.
Civic duty has many manifestations but a common thread is that it is duty and not choice. You give up something, you sacrifice for the greater good. You recognize everything that the Country has made available to you and give something back, not based on a personal agenda but what is honestly needed. Military service is not a requirement but civic duty has to do with service, with placing your wants, needs, and goals aside for however long to contribute to the whole. Now clever people can justify their behavior in a multitude of way. I've heard many a businessman describe making money as his civic duty because it contributes to the economy. Bullshit. Civic duty is like jazz insofar that we cannot definitely define it but we know it when we see it. In Aristotle's Nicomachean Ethics, he says that the highest level of courage is civic courage, and the body politic reserves a special respect for men who display it that cannot be purchased by any amount of riches. Though no metric may exist for it, it undoubtedly has substence.
You assert that critical thinking is a corner stone of active citizenship. That may be but again I wish to point out that active citizenship is not automatically good citizenship. I would say that most protestors believe themselves to be active citizens and I would agree. But good citizens? I have my doubts. Protesting is emotional masturbation. I've been in the halls of power when decisions were being made with not the slightest thought being given to protests. They achieve nothing but to give the less disciplined the idea that hey can make a contribution. Protests are a pressure valve so they serve a purpose in that way. The contrbution is minimal if at all. Protests affect weak minded people. It doesn't matter their size. 5 million people want to do a stupid thing, it is still a stupid thing. The point being activity does not necessarily mean good. An active surgeon may want to do all kinds of operations what which ones, if any, will actually benefit my health? As you can se, I am decidedly not a relativist. There is a natural law. There is right and wrong however a moderately educated person may wish to spin it. Just as there are better doctors, there are better teachers.
In no way was my young Marine trying to equate critical thinking with active citizenship. He was talking about propriety. He believed that it was improper to criticize until you have contributed to the Country- an idea that is very much out of vogue. People criticize the Country, Left and Right who have never done a damned thing beyond their own ambitions. As Teddy Roosevelt said, the credit doesn't go to the critic but the man who strives. My young Marine was displaying character I rarely see.
While I don't believe military service to be the sine qua non of good citizenship, I still believe it holds a special place in developing good citizens. The two primary things that the military teaches you are simple. You do not ever come before the team and you cannot talk your way out of bad performance. There is no more selfish creature on this planet than a human baby. The maturation process is about taking the focus off oneself and making it broader. Under that standard we, as a society, fail miserably. We also believe that success is your ability to talk your way of anything, the by product of a litigious society, particularly in places like NYC where cleverness is valued way more than character.
To sum up, I would just like to point out again that active citizenship is not necessarily good citizenship. Formal schooling may teach the habit and trappings of activity but in this indulgent day and age, I don't believe it capable of teaching character.
I offer as evidence Marine Corps Boot Camp which has been forced to tack on another week to Basic so that the Drill Instructors can talk to their recruits about words like duty, honor, integrity, etc. These young men are all high school graduates. In fact, the Marine Corps is very selective about who they take. Yet even with this initial screening, the Institution of Marine Corps felt it necessary to add on this character piece because it was lacking in the education of the recruits.
Is teaching a civic duty? Your argument for it is strong and were I to agree with your assumptions, it would be impervious. But you have personalized something I never meant to personalize. You may be qualified to teach citizenship. You may have contributed immeasurably to the Country. But I think you are the exception rather than the rule. Again, I think we have a disconnect of levels. I am not talking about the goals of public schooling. Who could disagree with that? I'm talking about it in practice where we cannot agree on the Pledge of Allegiance, intelligent design and multiculturalism. I am speaking strictly of the practice. Special teachers are special because they are rare. I wasn't lucky enough to have a high school teacher spark my interest in study or civic duty and I went the the best private school in Hawaii and then one of the best public schools in California. Even my undergraduate education did nothing to excite me or teach me anything about my civic duty. My college English courses were spent discussing the various works of Jane Austen, all of which I refused to read on general principle. You may be qualified to expand the bound of your curriculum but that doesn't make it true for your profession as a whole. False modesty aside, I would guess you believe yourself to be a better teacher than most. Why should the same rules apply to you that must apply to your less talented colleagues?
I cannot argue with what you have accomplished as a teacher. But your accomplishments prove your exceptionality. They do not vindicate the system as a whole. I never had the pleasure of one teacher who engaged me in such a manner. Out of the youth I coached in waterpolo, or the various kids I've trained in the martial arts, I have never seen evidence of what you do with your students. I have heard of your community work before you mentioned it and think you are contributing immeasurably to the lives of your students.
But what about teachers who are not as astute as you? What about teachers who cannot help but promote a partisan agenda? What about teachers just don't care as much as you do? I think they make up the bulk of the eucational system. With the lack of standards in obtaining a teaching certificate, how could it be any different?
Again, I speak of practice. Reading the paper is hardly educating oneself in the activities of the Country. The human mind understand nothing without context and the vast majority of people don't have the education to understand the context in which International Relations is played out. It is simply beyond their complexity horizon. The raw amount of data one must have at his fingers tips to understand the decisions made by our FP professionals is simply beyond natural ability of most people. People who have played the game (both literally and figuratively), generally have a very different view than those who haven't. Unless you have really gotten involved, reading the paper is voyeuristic. Personally, I rarely read the paper. For up to the date news, I find TV to be a better source. For context and commentary, there is no replacing the substance of a book. Basing an opinion on the paper is superficial.
I accept that my criticism may be wrong. I have had nowhere as many teachers as you have had students. As much as I have enjoyed my education, I am also dismayed by education gone wrong. I see the machinations of all the Masters of Universe playing their game theory with people lives and I think that this cannot be the end goal of education. Elie Wiesel once said that he distrusted intellectuals because of their ability to turn human life into abstractions. I am not ever talking about theory. My concerns are with practice.
Your passioned defense leads me to believe that you considered my work a personal attack. If that was the case, you have my very deepest apologies. No attack was meant. You brought up an issue that made me think. That's all. I have nothing for you but great affection and even greater respect. Again, thank you for taking the time to write your piece.
Aloha,
Kahuna6
4:18 PM
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
8:45 PM
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
11:42 AM
Your are Excellent. And so is your site! Keep up the good work. Bookmarked.
»
6:41 PM
Post a Comment
<< Home